Call us 0333 370 4333
30/05/19

Fraud Act 2006 Explained

Share

The Fraud Act 2006 recognized the fact that there were too many offences designed to tackle fraud and which confused Prosecutors as to which offence they should proceed with.

It was decided that a number of offences could be amalgamated into one single offence of fraud. For example, eight deception offences contained within the Theft Acts of 1968 and 1978 were replaced.

Whilst other fraud offences remain, such as common law fraud and cheating the revenue, the Fraud Act 2006 simplifies the implementation of prosecutions for fraudulent activity.

John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments on section 1 of the Act.

Fraud Act 2006 | Sections 2, 3 & 4

Section 1 provides for the new offence of fraud to be committed in three ways:

Section 2 Fraud by false representation:

A person is in breach of this section if they:

  • dishonestly make a false representation and
    intends, by making that representation,
  • to make a gain for themselves or another or
  • cause a loss to another or expose another
    to risk of loss.

Section 3 Fraud by failing to disclose information:

A person is in breach of this section if they:

  • dishonestly fail disclose to another person
    information which they are under a legal duty to disclose and
  • they intend, by failing to disclose the
    information
  • to make a gain for themselves or another,
    or
  • to cause loss to another or expose another
    to a risk of loss.

Section 4 Fraud by abuse of position:

 A person is in breach of this position if they:

  • occupy a position in which they are expected
    to safeguard, or not to act against the financial interests of another person.
  • dishonestly abuse that position and intend
    to
  • make a gain for themselves or another or
  • cause loss to another or expose another to a
    risk of loss.

Penalties For Conviction

Offences under the Act may be tried:  

  • in the Magistrates’ Court where
    conviction could result in a maximum six months  imprisonment and/or a fine not exceeding the
    statutory maximum.
  • in the Crown Court where a
    maximum term of ten years imprisonment and/or a fine may be imposed.

How Can We Help?

Kangs Solicitors has a national reputation for defending clients facing criminal prosecutions of all types including the most complex fraud offences.

Our team is led by Hamraj Kang who is recognised as a leading expert in the field. He is one of only two solicitors nationally to be ranked as a ‘star individual’ for four  consecutive years in the legal directory Chambers & Partners.

Other members of the team are ranked in the Legal 500 and also ranked in Chambers & Partners.

If you are in need of our expert help and advice please do not hesitate to contact our team:

Tel:       0333 370 4333

Email: info@kangssolicitors.co.uk

We provide initial no obligation discussion at our three offices in London, Birmingham, and Manchester. Alternatively, discussions can be held through video conferencing or telephone.

Hamraj Kang

Hamraj Kang
Senior Partner

Email Phone Mobile
John Veale

John Veale
Partner

Email Phone
Tim Thompson

Tim Thompson
Partner

Email Phone

Top ranked by leading legal directories Chambers UK and the Legal 500.

New Sentencing Guidelines (‘the New Guidelines’), which come into effect on 1st January 2020, have been issued covering adults convicted of Public Order Offences. John Veale of Kangs Solicitors comments upon the changes. Background | Kangs Sentencing Advisory Team In August 2008, the Sentencing Guidelines Council published Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines in respect of such […]
01/11/19
The Court of Appeal has recently handed down an important Judgement protecting legal professional privilege (‘LPP’). Helen Holder of Kangs Solicitors explains the nature of LPP. What is Legal Professional Privilege? | Kangs Criminal Law Advisory Team LPP protects all communications between professional legal advisors and their clients from being disclosed without each individual client’s […]
31/10/19
A cut-throat defence arises where, during criminal proceedings, a defendant gives evidence on his own behalf and which is not only likely to strengthen the prosecution case but is designed to damage a co-defendant’s case to the extent that it may go as far as blaming the co-defendant whilst endeavouring to exonerate himself. John Veale […]
30/10/19

Get in touch

Need legal assistance? Contact our experienced team for prompt and professional support.
Your privacy is important to us and all details you share will be kept confidential. Please note do not accept legal aid instructions.
Old map of Birmingham
0333 370 4333